Lanele Group (Pty) Ltd and Transnet SOC Limited concluded a development and commercial lease agreement on 7 December 2017 in terms of which Lanele would develop Transnet’s property by constructing a gantry and liquid storage facility valued at approximately R2 billion. Transnet undertook to contribute R75 million towards development-related costs. The lease was subject to suspensive conditions to be fulfilled within 36 months, including obtaining regulatory approvals and securing project funding. Lanele alleged that Transnet repudiated the lease by objecting to Lanele’s NERSA licence application and by instituting a self-review application to set aside its own decision to conclude the lease. Lanele accepted the alleged repudiation, cancelled the lease, and claimed damages exceeding R1.8 billion. Transnet pleaded that the lease was invalid because it was procured through a corrupt scheme involving senior Transnet officials and third parties, and it counterclaimed for repayment of approximately R85 million paid to Lanele on the basis of unjust enrichment. Lanele raised seven exceptions under Rule 23, alleging that Transnet’s plea and counterclaim were vague, embarrassing, and disclosed no defence or cause of action.