The appellants (the first to fourth appellants representing a Trust, and the fifth appellant in his personal capacity) raised a point in law before the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth. Dambuza J sitting as court of first instance dismissed the point in law and granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal. The matter concerned a dispute between the Trust and the fifth appellant on one side, and Brigid Mary Carstens (the respondent) on the other. The specific nature of the underlying dispute is not detailed in the judgment.
The appeal was struck off the roll. The Trust (represented by the first to fourth appellants) and the fifth appellant were ordered to pay the respondent's costs of appeal jointly and severally.
The dismissal of a point in law which amounts to the dismissal of an exception constitutes an interlocutory order and is not appealable to the Supreme Court of Appeal. An exception that has been dismissed does not constitute a final order capable of being appealed.
The judgment is brief and focused solely on the jurisdictional issue. There are no obiter dicta or non-binding observations in this judgment. The court did not comment on the merits of the underlying dispute between the parties or make any observations beyond what was necessary to determine the appealability of the order.
This case reaffirms the established principle in South African civil procedure that the dismissal of an exception is an interlocutory order and is not appealable. It serves as a reminder of the limitations on the right to appeal and the distinction between final and interlocutory orders. The case reinforces the binding precedents established in Maize Board v Tiger Oats Ltd and Zweni v Minister of Law and Order regarding the appealability of exceptions.