Kok v Osborne (1993): Mistake (Iustus Error) in Contract Law
Kok v Osborne on iustus error - the three requirements for setting aside a contract for mistake.
Kok v Osborne: When Can You Set Aside a Contract for Mistake?
Citation: Kok v Osborne 1993 (4) SA 788 (SE)
The Test for Iustus Error
A contract may be set aside if:
- Material mistake — About an essential term
- Reasonable mistake — A reasonable person would have made it
- Other party knew or should have known — About the mistake
If all three = No consensus = Contract void
Exam Application
Step 1: "Under Kok v Osborne, [party] can set aside the contract for mistake if the mistake was material, reasonable, and the other party knew/should have known."
Step 2: Material? "The mistake about [term] was material because it goes to the root of the agreement."
Step 3: Reasonable? "The mistake was reasonable because [reason]."
Step 4: Other party's knowledge? "[Party] knew/should have known about the mistake because [facts]."
Related
- Sonap Petroleum v Pappadogianis (1992) — Consensus in contract
- George v Fairmead Hotel (1958) — Material vs immaterial mistake
Tags: #contract #mistake #iustuserror #consensus #voidcontract
Enjoyed this piece?
Subscribe to get more case analyses and study tips like this — delivered occasionally, never spam.