Back to Blog
Published 10 days ago1 min read

Kok v Osborne (1993): Mistake (Iustus Error) in Contract Law

Kok v Osborne on iustus error - the three requirements for setting aside a contract for mistake.

Kok v Osborne: When Can You Set Aside a Contract for Mistake?

Citation: Kok v Osborne 1993 (4) SA 788 (SE)

The Test for Iustus Error

A contract may be set aside if:

  1. Material mistake — About an essential term
  2. Reasonable mistake — A reasonable person would have made it
  3. Other party knew or should have known — About the mistake

If all three = No consensus = Contract void

Exam Application

Step 1: "Under Kok v Osborne, [party] can set aside the contract for mistake if the mistake was material, reasonable, and the other party knew/should have known."

Step 2: Material? "The mistake about [term] was material because it goes to the root of the agreement."

Step 3: Reasonable? "The mistake was reasonable because [reason]."

Step 4: Other party's knowledge? "[Party] knew/should have known about the mistake because [facts]."

Related

  • Sonap Petroleum v Pappadogianis (1992) — Consensus in contract
  • George v Fairmead Hotel (1958) — Material vs immaterial mistake

Tags: #contract #mistake #iustuserror #consensus #voidcontract

Enjoyed this piece?

Subscribe to get more case analyses and study tips like this — delivered occasionally, never spam.

By subscribing you consent to receive occasional emails from CaseNotes. We won't share your address; unsubscribe in one click from any email. See our privacy policy.

C

Written by

CaseNotes