Published 10 days ago1 min read
Buthelezi v Poorter (1975): Factual Causation & the But-For Test
Buthelezi v Poorter established the but-for test for factual causation - essential for every delict problem question.
Buthelezi v Poorter: The But-For Test for Causation
Citation: Buthelezi v Poorter 1975 (4) SA 608 (W)
The Test
But for the defendant's conduct, would the harm have occurred? If NO, then factual causation is established.
This is the conditio sine qua non test.
Exam Application
Step 1: Identify defendant's conduct
Step 2: Ask: "But for [conduct], would [harm] have happened?"
Step 3: If answer is NO → Factual causation ✅
Note: This is only FACTUAL causation. You still need LEGAL causation (reasonably foreseeable consequences).
Related
- International Shipping v Bentley (1990) — Legal causation (novus actus interveniens)
- Minister of Police v Skosana (1977) — Causation in delict
Tags: #delict #causation #butfortest #factualcausation
Enjoyed this piece?
Subscribe to get more case analyses and study tips like this — delivered occasionally, never spam.